A fair question considering the circumstances.
Pop quiz: With a little more than seven minutes and 23 seconds left in the game, the ball on the Hokies' 1-yard line, your team losing 20-7 and fourth down on the scoreboard, what do the Bearcats do?
Answer: Run a sweep play with plodding quarterback Tony Pike.
This from the team with Mardy Gilyard, he of 158 yards on seven catches fame and Dominick Goodman, he of six catches for 51 yards and now Cincinnati's all-time leader in receiving yards fame.
A run play with your program's first-ever BCS title on the line? A run with a quarterback who doesn't exactly have a 1-2 in his step? A run,
when the only element of your offense that's had any bit of success is the pass?"Yeah, I was a little bit (surprised)," said Virginia Tech defensive coordinator Bud Foster. "They had their run formation out there, but I thought they were playing a little game with us."
When arguably the nation's top defensive coordinator is scratching his head, you know it's an odd call.
But the Bearcats players defended the play, like good soldiers.
"I wasn't (surprised)," said uber-receiver Gilyard. "I was surprised at the type of run that was called. We've got good backs. I thought we would try to get those backs into the end zone somehow someway, but a quarterback sweep? I didn't understand why we run an outside sweep instead of running inside."
Maybe Pike, the quarterback who rose from obscurity to lead the Bearcats to their first Big East title, can help shed some light on the play call.

"We just put that play in this week," Pike said.
Oh, a new play. Makes sense to run something the team is barely familiar with. One that a passing team is supposed to execute in the most important seconds of the program's history?
The more you hear about the genesis of this play, the less you want to hear.
"It was more trying to get to the pylon," Pike said. "But they did a great job having me turn up. They stood me up. I have faith in what coach calls. You have an o-line with seniors and I'm running on their back. I had confidence on what was called."
It seems to happen more and more. Trickery, or going against what got a program to where it is, in crunch time. The Bearcats had no business lining up mano-y-mano with the trench warriors of Foster's regiment. But coach Brian Kelly, the offensive genius he is, decided against say, putting trips left and two receivers on the right and giving Pike the option to find one of his superstar receivers or running a quarterback draw. That formation, trips left, two receivers on the right was nothing but successful for the Bearcats. It's how they scored their lone touchdown and it's how they found room in between the 20s to move relatively easily on the Hokies for portions of the game.
But when the time came, the time that defines what your program's offense is all about, Kelly's team did something very un-Cincinnatian. Now I know what you're thinking. If it works, and the Bearcats come back, it's genius. Maybe so. But why coaches at all levels decide to ditch the bread and butter for lamb and tuna fish in the most important part of a game boggles the mind.
If you're going to lose, lose guns blazing. If you're going to win, win with what made you the program you are. Don't do something put in the week of the big game. That's the stuff of Hollywood, not BCS games.

Call it a learning experience for Kelly. Call it me being overly critical. But it's part of a bigger problem of coaches unwilling to trust the DNA of their program in critical times and part of the reason may be insecurity. If spreading it out on the 1-yard line fails, it's now the system's fault -- the spread failed Cincinnati at its most important time. And if the spread fails, Brian Kelly fails. And the experiment in Cincy fails. That's not something a coach wants to live with. Now Kelly can go back and say, "well, if only we had stuck with my scheme. If only we hadn't ran the ball one last time, considering the lack of success -- 64 rushing yards -- the team had running all evening."
But the real Kelly said this:
"Well, obviously this is what you play for. You know, you play -- you work out in the summer and the preseason camp to get an opportunity to get to this point. But you want to finish it off, so there's a lot of disappointment obviously in our locker room."
There's disappointment because Cincinnati abandoned the summer, preseason, the regular season, and 85 percent of the game up until that point by running a sweep on the most important play of the game with its least attractive option.





h and Judy program. 
As the year winds down, In Love with the Game, Mom's View tearfull yreflects on a memory that molded her life, and I'd guess many others --